SYLLABUS-IN-PROGRESS

Religious Studies 3D03 (Winter 2003)

God, Reason, and Evil

updated April 7, 2003 


Final Exam Preparation Sheet has been posted.


This syllabus is posted at http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/danahol/3d03 and is also accessible by way of my home page (see below).  It will be updated periodically, and students in the class are asked to consult it regularly during the semester.


CLASS MEETINGS:
Monday and Wednesday, 11:30 a.m.-12:20 p.m., Psychology Building (PC) 155 - new location as of January 22: A. N. Bourns Science Building (ABB) 136

Tutorial T01: Wednesday, 12:30-1:20 p.m., Life Sciences Building (LS) B130E new location as of January 22: John Hodgkins Engineering (JHE) A101 

T02: Wednesday 4:30-5:20 p.m., Life Sciences Building (LS) B130E


INSTRUCTOR:

Dana Hollander
Department of Religious Studies
University Hall 109
(905) 525-9140, ext. 24759*
danahol@mcmaster.ca*  

*in your phone and e-mail messages, please let me know how I can reach you by phone

http://univmail.cis.mcmaster.ca/~danahol/

Office Hours: Mondays, 1-2 p.m., or e-mail me for an appointment

TEACHING ASSISTANT:

Robert Virdis
Department of Religious Studies
University Hall B122

virdisrs@mcmaster.ca

Office Hours: Wednesdays, 2:30-3:30 p.m.

 

 

 

Course Description / Course Readings / Course Requirements  

SCHEDULE: January / February / March / April


Course Description

In the history of Western thought, there is an ongoing tradition of asking whether the fact of human suffering, or of evil in the world, can be compatible with the existence of a benevolent God.  As Philo puts the problem in Hume's Dialogues: "Epicurus's old questions are yet unanswered. Is [God] willing to prevent evil, but not able? then is he impotent. Is he able, but not willing? then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? whence then is evil?"  The first part of this course will look at some ways that the question of God's existence has been linked with that of the presence of suffering and evil--exploring the theme of "theodicy" in writings by Freud, Hume, and Kant.  In the second part, we will turn to Philo's third question: the origin of evil.  Is a concept of evil necessary for an understanding of morality?  After studying this question by reading further in Kant, we will turn to a specifically post-Holocaust confrontation with the question of evil by looking at Hannah Arendt's Eichmann in Jerusalem.


Course Readings

You can generally obtain these in a number of ways - see details for each title on the syllabus.

At times you may be asked to consult or make your own copy from a book on reserve.

You must have your own copy of all the texts to be discussed--with the same pagination as the edition selected for the class--whether in book or xeroxed form, and be prepared to refer to specific passages in class.


Course Requirements

In preparing this and other written assignments, you are encouraged to use the resources of the Writing Clinic on campus.

Grades are based on Take-Home Quizzes (25%), Attendance/Participation (20%), Midterm Exam (25%), Final Exam (30%).  Failure to write either of the two examinations, or 8 unexcused absences from class, constitute sufficient grounds for earning an "F" in the class.

McMaster University has a strict policy concerning Academic Dishonesty.  Please familiarize yourself with the Statement on Academic Ethics and the Senate Resolutions on Academic Dishonesty.

You are advised to retain copies of any written work you submit for this class, and all your research notes, until you have received an official grade.


January 6-22

INTRODUCTION

FREUD: The Value of Religious Ideas 

Sigmund Freud, The Future of an Illusion (1927) [book available for purchase/on reserve], I, II, III, VI, VII, VIII

Take-Home Quiz 1 due in class January 13.


January 27, 29, February 3

HUME: God and Theodicy I

David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779) [book available for purchase/on reserve]

Take-Home Quiz 2 due in class January 22 or January 27


February 5, 10, 12, 24

KANT: God and Theodicy II

Immanuel Kant, "On the Miscarriage of All Philosophical Trials in Theodicy" (1791), trans. George di Giovanni, in Kant, Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and Other Writings [book available for purchase/on reserve]: read up to p. 26 (i.e., skip the "Concluding Remark").  See facsimile of German original from the Berlinische Monatsschrift here.

Take-Home Quiz 3/3A due in class on February 5 or February 10.

Supplementary: 

Study Questions for February 24

  1. Having established the "outcome" of the first few pages of the "Theodicy" essay, namely that "every previous theodicy has not performed what it promised," Kant proceeds to show that no future attempt at theodicy can succeed either. How does he argue for this conclusion? (pp. 23-24 - to the section break).
  2. Why does Kant turn to a discussion of the book of Job? That is, what does the book of Job exemplify for him? (pp. 24-25)
  3. In his reading of the book of Job, Kant discerns two positions, that of Job himself, and that of Job's friends. How does he characterize the two positions, which one does he prefer, and why? (pp. 25-26)

February 26 and March 3

MIDTERM EXAM  

See Midterm Preparation Sheet for details.


March 5

KANT: Good and Evil

NOTE: the references below are to the marginal page numbers of Kant's Grounding; these refer to the pagination of the standard German edition and appear in most English-language editions of this work.

Immanuel Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785), trans. James W. Ellington [book available for purchase/on reserve], First Section: 

from Grounding, Second Section:

 


March 10, 12, 17

KANT: Good and Evil, cont'd

Immanuel Kant, Part One of Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason (1792/1793), trans. George di Giovanni [book available for purchase/on reserve]: 45-56 middle (no need to dwell on the footnotes); 57 ("Now the ground...") - 60 middle of first paragraph ("...the sole incentive"); 61-65 (i.e., read all of section IV).

Part One was originally published as a standalone article entitled "On Radical Evil in Human Nature" in the Berlinische Monatsschrift. See facsimile here.

Take-Home Quiz 4 due in class on March 10 or 12

Supplementary:


March 19

Two Holocaust Trials: Nuremberg and Eichmann

Andrew Altman, Arguing About Law. An Introduction to Legal Philosophy (1996): "Judgment at Nuremberg," 23-29 [copy on reserve / included in coursepack]

Howard Ball, Prosecuting War Crimes and Genocide (1999), chap. 2: "World War II in Europe and the Nuremberg Tribunal," esp. 44-61 [book on reserve; included in coursepack]

Nuremberg Trial Proceedings: Charter of the International Military Tribunal (on the Avalon Project website at Yale Law School)

Lawrence Douglas, The Memory of Judgment. Making Law and History in the Trials of the Holocaust (2001), chap 2: "The Idiom of Judgment: Crimes Against Humanity" [book on reserve;  included in coursepack]

Additional Resources:

Take-Home Quiz 5 due in class today.


screening of The Specialist (dir. Eyal Sivan, 1999) - March 20, 6 p.m.-8:15 p.m. in ABB 136

If you cannot make this screening time, you can

  • watch the video at the Lyons Instructional Media Centre (TSH 314 & 331) on Friday, March 21, 8:30-4:30, or on Monday, March 24, 8:30-11:30 (in time for our class meeting); or

  • watch a rented copy from a video store some time before March 24


March 24-26

finish discussion of Ball and Douglas articles on the Nuremberg trials

ARENDT: Eichmann and Evil

Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963) [purchase book / different edition on reserve - Since the pagination of the reserve copy differs from that of the one available for purchase, you do need to buy the book in this one instance.]: chap. 1: "The House of Justice"; chap. 3: "An Expert on the Jewish Question"; chap. 6: "The Final Solution: Killing" (SKIP pp. 98-105 top)

Susan Neiman,* "Theodicy in Jerusalem" in Steven Aschheim (ed.), Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem (2001) [copy of article in coursepack; book on reserve], to p. 73.

Optional Take-Home Quiz 6 due in class on March 26. 

Supplementary:

March 31, April 2, April 7

Arendt, chap. 7: "The Wannsee Conference, or Pontius Pilate"; chap. 15: "Judgment, Appeal, and Execution," pp. 249-52; "Epilogue"; "Postscript" (3/28/03 Note: the pagination of the reserve copy of the Arendt differs from that of the one available for purchase.  So in this one instance, you do need to buy the book.)

"Eichmann in Jerusalem: An Exchange of Letters between Gershom Scholem and Hannah Arendt" (1963) in Arendt, The Jew as Pariah, ed. Ron Feldman (1978) [copy in coursepack; book on reserve]

Susan Neiman,* "Theodicy in Jerusalem," pp. 73 bottom-end.

Take-Home Quiz 7/7A due in class on March 31 or April 2.

*Exciting News: Professor Susan Neiman (Einstein Forum, Potsdam, Germany) has accepted an invitation from the Department of Religious Studies to visit McMaster as a Hooker Visiting Professor in October 2003! 

Additional Resources:


FINAL EXAM  

Monday, April 14, 2:00 p.m., in Convocation Hall, University Hall.  The final exam will consist of two essay questions.  See Final Exam Preparation Sheet.

There will be an optional review session on Wednesday, April 9, 10:00 a.m. (for 1-2 hours, as needed) at University Hall 103.


  Copyright © 2003 Dana Hollander